Learning Contentment

“I can do all things through him who strengthens me.” These words, written by the Apostle Paul to the Philippian church (Philippians 4:13), have been uttered by many people throughout the ages. But what does Paul mean by these words? Can we just claim whatever we want and expect that God has to give it? There are two important rules for interpreting Scripture. (Surely there are more, but let’s just focus on two!)

The first rule has to do with the context of the passage. For example, this verse has been used by some to mean that as long as we trust in God we can do anything – whether that is changing the course of nature, making a million dollars, or bench pressing 500 pounds. Yes, I have heard this verse used for each of these things. What was Paul really talking about though?

When he says ‘I can do all things’ we need to look at the context of what he’s been writing. Just before verse 13 he wrote, ‘I know how to be brought low, and I know how to abound. In any and every circumstance, I have learned the secret of facing plenty and hunger, abundance and need.’ So Paul isn’t saying anything at all about doing or getting whatever he wants. He’s talking about being content in any circumstance, even when things aren’t great.

This makes his words both clearer and more helpful to us. His words are clearer because now we know that Paul wasn’t talking about lifting weights, flying to the moon, or any other number of things we might try. They are more helpful because this is really where we need help anyway. Sure, we might want to make a million dollars…but it’s far more useful to be able to be content no matter our circumstances.

The second rule is called the “analogy of faith.” This is a phrase that was first used by Augustine but it’s been around longer than that. Simply stated, this means that when we find something in the Bible that is difficult to understand, we look to other parts that are easier to understand and help shed light on the passage in question.

This is something that we all know intuitively. If you find yourself in a dark area where you have lost something what do you do to find it? Do you grope around in the dark, hoping that your hand will come across it? Well, maybe if that’s your only choice. But what if you had a flashlight? Of course you would shine the light on that area. This also works for studying the Bible only we don’t use a flashlight; we use other passages to illumine the passage in question.

Paul says that he can do all things through the one who gives him strength. The best illustrations are those that come from Scripture. Since we know, from the context, that Paul is talking about being content, we can consider Joseph from the book of Genesis. His life is detailed in chapters 37-50. In those chapters, we learn about Joseph’s brothers selling him into slavery and, later, that Joseph is falsely accused and sent to jail. During his time in jail he rose to a place of prominence and was taken out of prison and made second in command over all Egypt.

Joseph knew what it was to have much and he knew what it was and to have little. Through it all, though, he continued to trust God. In fact, his faith is so incredible that when he finally meets his brothers who sold him into slavery in the beginning he says to them, “As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today.” Joseph was able to be content because he trusted in God – the one who gave him strength.

Like Paul, he learned how to be content in all circumstances. This is a lesson for us as well. Not just a lesson in how to study the Bible but a lesson to show that when we study the Bible properly we are able to learn from it. The Bible is not some outdated book or something that requires an infallible church tradition to understand. No, God grants wisdom and his own Spirit to his people to be able to read the Scriptures and to come to an understanding of the faith.

Posted in Uncategorized |

A Voters’ Guide for the Perplexed

By Richard M. Gamble

Zion or Babylon? Over the past four hundred years, Americans have had a hard time deciding if they were building a New Zion or calling down judgment on a New Babylon. In truth, the earnest among them on the left and right have been busy doing both.

Christians have found it tempting to call their nation “God’s New Israel” and a “city on a hill” without pausing long enough to consider that those titles belong not to any nation but to the Church. At the other extreme, when their nation and its rulers disappoint them, they raise the alarm that the Antichrist and the Apocalypse are just around the corner.

Lost in all this confusion is the distinction between Zion and Babylon, the Church and the world, the City of God and the City of Man. To those Jews exiled in literal Babylon, the prophet Jeremiah urged them to build houses, have families, and get to work. While they waited for their return to the Promised Land, they must “seek the welfare of the city” and pray for it, because “in its welfare you will find your welfare.”

Centuries later, St. Augustine repeated this advice to Christians on their earthly pilgrimage. The Church lived in the Roman Empire, the City of Man, the latest version of Babylon. Tying Jeremiah’s advice to the Apostle Paul’s call to the Church “to live a quiet and tranquil life,” the Bishop of Hippo reminded his fellow believers that they live “mingled together” with unbelievers.

This mingling was temporary, but on this side of the Last Judgment Christians benefited from the “peace of Babylon.” Though as God’s people they were spiritually “free from Babylon,” as citizens of Rome they ought to make use of “the temporal peace which the good and wicked together enjoy.”

In modern America, Christians face the same challenge and opportunity. The good and wicked live together, and they both benefit from earthly peace. Despite living in troubled times, Christians still benefit from a remarkable degree of safety and prosperity afforded them by America. They can boldly pray for continued liberty to gather for worship and preach the gospel, knowing that in Babylon’s temporary peace they have peace, in Babylon’s temporary freedom they have freedom.

But in doing so, Christians also ought to remember that they are on pilgrimage. Their nation is not Zion. It is not the City of God. It is not even the suburbs of the City of God. But neither is it a gated community. It lives in the world without being of the world. America is not the Church. It is not the Bride of Christ. In fact, they aren’t even dating.

The Church has its own identity and mission apart from America. Confusion between the two does nobody any good, believer nor unbeliever. The Church has its own warfare, its own economy, its own society, its own politics. In the words of Princeton theologian J. Gresham Machen, the Church dare not bring the “warfare of the world” into the household of God.

Christians don’t play by the same rules in God’s kingdom as the world does in its kingdom. God’s household welcomes “every nation, tribe, people, and language.” A nation may choose to do otherwise by the light of its own wisdom. God’s household shares property in common. A nation may choose a different system. God’s household wages spiritual warfare. A nation may choose to wage earthly warfare as circumstances demand. God’s household turns things upside down, makes the first last and the last first, where the “greatest” serves the “least.” A nation has its own hierarchy and command structure, and winners and losers.

If all this is true, how can such distinctions possibly help Christians vote in local, state, and national elections?

On the political left and right today, liberal and conservative Christians want America to look more like their idea of the City of God and less like their idea of Babylon. The truth is that God’s people are called now, as always, to seek the peace of the City of Man. Our elected officials are not voted into office to turn Babylon into Zion. They have a much more mundane task—though still a difficult and at times a demanding one with high stakes for the welfare of the city.

Christians in America enjoy a historically rare privilege: they get to vote for those who rule over them. They have not yet reached the point of choosing between Nero and Caligula despite the common impression. When they vote, they have the responsibility before God to ask one question: which candidate will promote the well-being of the city, for, as Jeremiah said, “in its welfare you will find your welfare.”

If you are a perplexed Christian and a perplexed American, pray and vote. Pray and vote for a future in which the Church can do its work and be at peace. Pray and vote for the welfare of your city. And when you gather for worship, leave the world’s warfare outside God’s household.

Richard M. Gamble is a professor of history at Hillsdale College and a ruling elder at Hillsdale Orthodox Presbyterian Church.

Posted in Uncategorized |